Protection Ratings?
Here is something I wrote in response to a question at the Seybert’s forums. Someone asked for a sort of rating for protection based on some criteria he established. The question was asked several years ago and it was never really answered by anyone else. So I took a shot at it. Original thread is here http://www.seybertsbulletin.com/showthread.php?3700-Cue-Case-protection-quot-ratings-quot&p=42269#post42269
Okay, I was just wondering about the protection a few brands of cue cases offered compared to each other. To make things easier for me, I will ask any responders to rate the cases on the following categories on a scale of 1 to 10, with 1 = worst and 10 = best:-Structural protection (against falls, being crushed, banged around, etc.)
-Environmental seal (water/moisture resistance/proofing, dust/sand shielding, etc.)
-Anti-theft (locks, closures, physical “armor”, etc.)The brands I am thinking about are:
Instroke
Talisman
Jim Murnak
Whitten
Justis
On QIf you know of other cue case brands that you feel offer good protection, feel free to add them in.
Thanks to any responders. And I know this is all subjective.
Rating them based solely on your criteria and adding a few brands to the list here is my rating. Based on the fact that I have taken apart all of these cases. 10 is best and 1 is worst. The highest consideration is given to impact protection. And please consider that these cases are not crush proof like a Zero Haliburton – they provide the most resistance that they can using the materials that they do.
JB Cases – special tubing, extra padding, form fitted lids, sealed bottoms – 9 (because nothing is perfect)
Sterling Cases with JB Interiors – special tubing, extra padding, sealed bottom – 7
J.Flowers Tributes – (JB Case design) extra padding, sealed bottom – 7
GTF – reworked Fellini design by JB Cases – special tubing, extra padding, form fitting lids, sealed bottoms – 8
Instroke – Padded tubes, snug lid (I hope they are still snug) – 8
Talisman – unpadded tubes, loose lid – 4
Jim Murnak – unpadded thin tubes, rough liner, exposed metal, loose lid – 3
Whitten light – light model uses unpadded poster tubes, superior construction – 4
Whitten heavy – unpadded tubes – solid construction – 5
Justis – excess movement in the ProLight and Sport interiors, some padding, loose lid – 5
On Q – unpadded tubes, snug lid – 5
Please keep in mind that these ratings are objective based on inspection and dissection of the cases. But they are SUBJECTIVE based on the fact that I am a case maker with a vested interest in seeing my products at the top of the list. My thing is protection first so I naturally look at whatever the other guys are doing and try to be better than them. I think that we are BUT the fact of it is that all of these cases on the list are good products. Protection is simply layers like armor. If you are like me and prefer to toss your cue into the back seat and occasionally drop the case then you want more layers of protection between the cue and the rest of the world. If you are someone who is careful to handle the case so that it’s rarely knocked or bumped then certainly you can live with less layers of protection. The indisputable fact is that more padding is better than less padding. Around the net in every hobby or occupation outside of billiards wherever the best cases are discussed those cases are ALWAYS the most secure padded ones. In pool people tend to think of the outward appearance first and then make a judgement (assumption) that if the exterior looks good then the interior must be ok. This is unfortunately not true.
For whatever reason case makers often skimp on the interior because it’s a boring chore to make them, not nearly as exciting as doing the exteriors. And some case makers appear to have not studied the object they are protecting well enough. A pool cue is a precision instrument designed to focus energy into a small point. It is a collection of thin wooden parts held together by bolts and glue. It is not meant to be able to handle lateral stress, not meant to be bent or struck on the side. A cue appears to be fairly solid but in fact they are very fragile and it does not take much to induce stress cracks in any of the joints. Therefore when the cue is being transported it is advisable to limit movement as much as possible.
Therefore it is my opinion that padding in a cue case is essential to protecting the cue from bumps and stress while in transport. Other case makers do not share this view and they point to the fact that many people use their products with no harm to the cue. This is a very good point. My counterpoint is that this does not mean that the case is responsible for the fact that the cues have not been harmed and in any given situation the case with padding will protect more than the one without padding. I build cases for the day when the user is not careful and the day when something out of control happens.
So essentially there are two philosophies among case makers. One is the user-responsibility concept, that the user must be careful to adapt their behavior to the protection level of the case. And the second is the accident concept which supposes that things happen beyond the user’s control and the case should help to protect in those situations.
The major difference in both concepts is that both cases protect equally well when nothing is threatening. But the padded case protects better all the time. Assume for a moment that you have a simple situation with a dog in the house and you come home and set the case down leaning against the wall. Your dog joyously greets you and in the process sends the case clattering to the floor.
In this situation the unpadded case falls down and the cues inside hit the walls of the tubes violently or hit each other violently for a second or two before settling down. Maybe nothing happens to the cues at all. Then again maybe the violence created a tiny internal hairline crack that you can’t see but which over the next few weeks develops into an audible buzz.
If the case were padded then the chance that this occurs would be lessened to zero. In other words, just a little padding goes a LONG way towards keeping your cues safe from harm. After all no one wants to be without their cues, no one wants to play with cues that are buzzing or otherwise disturbing. The function of a cue case is to protect the cue and to me protecting against everyday life is very easy by using foam rubber and clever construction.
I have written a lot and I have also made a bet on AZB not to badmouth other case makers. So to be perfectly clear, I HIGHLY respect all the case makers on the list and I think each of them is building cases according to their honest opinion of what level of protection is sufficient. I happen to disagree with some of them but were I not a case maker then I feel that I would be happy with any of their products. I hope that no one takes this the wrong way and considers it badmouthing when I simply explain my position on padded protection vs. no padding.
Sincerely,
John Barton
Case Maker – representing JB Cases, Sterling Cases, Wave Cases, J.Flowers Tribute Cases and GTF Cases.
Update: I didn’t really say anything about the latches but I should have. Basically cases which use purse latches are going to have latch failure at some point. The weight and motion dynamics of using a cue case put too much stress on a latch built for a purse. Instroke has solved this by inventing the Diamond Latch which is strong enough for cases. Murnak uses purse latches. OnQ’s latches are durable. Talisman use a buckle system that works ok. Whitten uses zippers which are high quality. GTF uses a pressure fit for the whole lid and a spring latch that is durable but also easily replaceable should it break. J.Flowers and Justis use line snaps which are ok as long as they hold up. J.Flowers uses two for extra security while Justis uses one and sometimes two. JB Cases typically uses a Puzzle Latch invented by myself which has either no moving parts with the magnetic version or one twist section with a strong rivet shank for the Puzzle Twist version. Both versions are built with durability and strength.
There you go.





